CAIN Web Service
Education and Religion in Northern Ireland
Section 10: Schools and Community Relations
[CAIN_Home]
[Key_Events]
Key_Issues]
[Conflict_Background]
Text: A. M. Gallagher ... Page Design: Fionnuala
McKenna
Material is added to this site on a regular basis - information on this page may change
Section Ten Schools and Community Relations
Up to now this review has concentrated on the material differences
between the parallel religious school systems in Northern Ireland and has
examined, within each system, some of the consequences of that division.
A further question that has promoted much research concerns the extent to
which the segregated school systems have had a societal impact. This
question has been posed in two contrasting forms: firstly, does religious
division in education help to fuel social conflict? and secondly, can
education provide a vehicle towards an amelioration of social conflict?
(Boyle, 1976; Darby et al., 1977; Darby, 1978; Fulton, 1980; Dunn, 1986b;
for related research see McKeown, 1973; Russell, 1974/5; McKernan, 1982;
Harbison and Harbison, 1980; Harbison, 1983; 1989).
Segregated schools
Few would argue that the segregated school systems produced the conflict
while few would deny any contributory role. A series of studies based in
the University of Ulster have indicated that the school systems are
segregated, that there are relatively few contacts across the divide and
that a fully integrated school system is unlikely in the foreseeable
future (Darby et al., 1977; Dunn et al. 1984).
Two basic hypotheses have been advanced on the effect of segregated
schooling (Darby and Dunn, 1987). Firstly, it is suggested that
segregated schools differ in the cultural environment provided for
children, leading to a situation of cultural apartheid'. Evidence on this
is not clear: on the one hand research on the formal curriculum of
schools points to many similarities between Protestant and Catholic
schools (see sections 2 and 5). On the other hand there has been
relatively little research on the more abstract notions of 'school ethos'
and the 'hidden curriculum' of schools. Darby and Dunn (1987) suggest
this is largely because 'the earlier research had reached the classroom
door, but had not entered. The difficulty of examining the teaching of
controversial subjects alongside the teacher has proved too great' (p.88).
The second hypothesis regarding the effect of segregated schools suggests
that the fact of separation is what matters: this is termed 'social
apartheid'. This view holds that, regardless of similarities in what is
taught in the schools, segregated schooling initiates children into the
conflict by emphasising and validating group differences and hostilities,
and encouraging mutual ignorance and, perhaps more importantly. mutual
suspicion (Murray, 1983; 1985a; 1985b). The simplest way to assess this
view would be to compare children from segregated and integrated schools:
unfortunately, until recently there were relatively few children in the
latter category.
Integrated schools
There have been numerous calls for integrated education (see for example,
Fraser, 1974; Heskin, 1980; Spence, 1987). Such calls are often based on
some variant of the 'contact hypothesis', that is the idea that contact
between members of opposing groups can, under certain conditions,
ameliorate the conflict (Hewstone and Brown, 1986; Trew, 1986; 1989).
Perhaps one of the most significant educational developments of the 1980s
has been the growth of an 'integrated sector' in Northern Ireland:
currently there are two planned integrated post-primary schools and eight
such primary schools, a rate of development that has surprised some of
those favourably disposed towards integration (Darby and Dunn. 1987).
Also, educational reform proposals published by the DENI in 1988 included
specific proposals for developments in this area, including making it a
statutory duty to encourage initiatives in integrated schooling (DENI
1988a; 1988b).
Alternative strategies for encouraging community relations
Despite this, it is clear that if education is to make some contribution
to better community relations then the available options range wider than
between a segregated status quo and integration (Dunn, in submission;
Dunn and Morgan, 1988). Indeed, setting the discussion in such stark
terms may be counter-productive in that some may perceive integration as
covert assimilation and a threat to identity.
In practice three strategies have been advanced (see Dunn, 1986b, for a
more detailed discussion of these). The first involves action within
schools, usually aimed at curricular initiatives. Examples of such
initiatives include the Schools Curriculum Project, developed in the
Queen's University of Belfast in 1973, and the Schools Cultural Studies
Project, developed in the New University of Ulster in 1974 (see Skilbeck,
1973; Malone, 1973; O'Connor, 1980). More recently the Northern Ireland
Council for Educational Development produced guidelines for Education for
Mutual Understanding (EMU) which deals with, among other things,
community relations issues. EMU and Cultural Heritage are to be
introduced into schools as cross-curricular themes.
The second strategy works also within the already existing schools system
but attempts to promote inter-school links with a view to promoting
reconciliatory attitudes. Over the years such attempts have often had an
ad hoc character, relying on the involvement of a small number of
motivated teachers for their success. Also, such links often do not
appear to directly address community relations issues. There appears to
be little published information on evaluations of such practices, or
indeed, the extent to which they are attempted. Currently, a study based
in the Centre for the Study of Conflict is attempting to develop a model
for inter-school links which, it is hoped, will acquire a greater degree
of permanence by becoming institutionalised in school life (Dunn and
Smith, 1989). This project, involving primary and post-primary schools in
a small market town in the west of the province, is being supported by
the Western Education and Library Board.
The third strategy involves the development of integrated schools and, as
indicated above, this strategy has led to the development of what can
almost be described as an 'integrated sector'. It is significant,
however, that all the planned integrated schools are new schools, rather
than old schools changing their status. In a period of falling school
enrolments, with primary and secondary schools closing down, it is much
harder to open new schools without causing resentment. However, the
alternative, of changing a religiously homogeneous school into a
religiously heterogeneous one, has yet to produce a single integrated
school, despite a legislative basis for such a change. Despite this, the
DENIs educational reform proposals promoted this alternative with the
promise of support for any school wishing to adopt maintained integrated
status.
"Two basic hypotheses have
been
advanced to the effect of segregated schooling. Firstly, it is
suggested that segregated schools differ in the cultural environment
provided for children, leading to a situation of cultural apartheid
The second suggests that the fact of segregation is what matters: this
is termed social apartheid." |
All three strategies are fraught with difficulties. Attempts within the
existing school system require the willing co-operation of teachers and
principals, yet many are understandably wary of bringing controversial
issues into the classroom (McKernan, 1982). Nevertheless, current DENI
curriculum initiatives, involving EMU and Cultural Heritage, will attempt
to make dealing with such issues a necessary part of the curriculum.
Also, there is a problem in evaluating any of the above strategies: it is
by no means clear what are the best methods of promoting community
relations in the short or longer terms (see for example, Trew, 1986;
1989). In addition, the educational system does not exist in isolation
from the rest of Northern Ireland society. While the adult community
continues to be characterised by political polarisation and division, it
may be unfair to foist the solving of the problem onto the shoulders of
the children (Cairns, 1987).
Return to Contents Page
If you have any questions or comments regarding the
CAIN service please send an email message.
Or you can contact the CAIN Project Manager directly at the following
email address: m.melaugh@ulst.ac.uk
© 1996-2002 CAIN Project
Last Modified by Dr Martin Melaugh :
Back to the top of this page
|