Research Report No.1 - Appendix 5
|
|
APPENDIX FIVE : TABULAR REPORT
Q3. In what year did you first conduct a monitoring exercise on
the community background of employees
. | 1985 OR
EARLIER
| 1986
| 1987
| 1988
| 1989
| 1990
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| | | |
|
TOTAL | 2%
| 1% | 1%
| 6% | 19%
| 70% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
3% | 3%
| 6% | 6%
| 18% | 65%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
2% | 1%
| 1% | 5%
| 19% | 71%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 2%
| 1% | 1%
| 4% | 17%
| 76% | 148
|
50-99 | 3%
| 1% | 0%
| 3% | 17%
| 76% | 105
|
100 + | 2%
| 2% | 4%
| 11% | 25%
| 55% | 118
|
Q4. In Conducting the Monitoring Exercise in 1990 did you make
use of the Fair Employment Code of Practice?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 97%
| 3% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
100% | 0%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
97% | 3%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 96%
| 4% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 98%
| 2% | 105
|
100 + | 98%
| 2% | 118
|
Q5 Did you find the code of practice . . . . . . . . . .
. | VERY
USEFUL
| QUITE
USEFUL
| NOT PARTIC.
USEFUL
| NOT AT
ALL USEFUL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 25%
| 64% | 9%
| 2% | 361
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
33% | 64%
| 3% | 0%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
25% | 64%
| 9% | 2%
| 329 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 25%
| 65% | 8%
| 3% | 142
|
50 - 99 | 20%
| 66% | 14%
| 1% | 103
|
100 + | 32%
| 63% | 5%
| 1% | 116
|
Q6. In connection with your first statutory monitoring return
in 1990 did you seek any advice or information from the Fair Employment
Commission ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 41%
| 59% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
80% | 20%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
39% | 61%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 41%
| 59% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 39%
| 61% | 105
|
100 + | 45%
| 55% | 118
|
Q7. What type of advice or information did you request from the
FEC?
. | GEN
ASSIST
| RESID
METHOD
| CLASSIFY
CATEGORISE
| MONITOR
EXCERISE
| EMPLOYEE
ELIGIBILTY
| RECRUIT
MENT
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
|
TOTAL
| 57% | 6%
| 12% | 14%
| 10% | 1%
| 160 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC | 20%
| 18% | 11%
| 34% | 18%
| 0% | 26
|
PRIVATE | 61%
| 5% | 13%
| 11% | 9%
| 1% | 134
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 62%
| 0% | 10%
| 16% | 10%
| 0% | 61
|
50-99 | 57%
| 10% | 15%
| 9% | 6%
| 3% | 42
|
100 + | 44%
| 14% | 14%
| 14% | 14%
| 0% | 57
|
Q8. How helpful did you find the advice/information given by the
FEC ?
. | VERY
HELPFUL
| QUITE
HELPFUL
| NOT PARTIC.
HELPFUL
| NOT AT
ALL HELPFUL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 43%
| 52% | 5%
| * % | 160
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
48% | 41%
| 11% | 0%
| 26 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
42% | 53%
| 4% | 1%
| 134 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 38%
| 57% | 5%
| 0% | 61
|
50-99 | 37%
| 57% | 3%
| 3% | 42
|
100+ | 55%
| 39% | 6%
| 0% | 57
|
(* less than 1%) |
Q9. During 1990 and 1991 have you had any contact with the FEC
on matters other than registration and monitoring ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 22%
| 78% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
45% | 55%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
20% | 80%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 18%
| 82% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 21%
| 79% | 105
|
100 + | 28%
| 72% | 118
|
Q10. What type of contact was this and for what purpose ?
. | INVEST
COMPLAINT
| GUIDE-
LINES
| PRACTICE
| CONSULT
SERVICES
| UNFAIR
DISMISS
| ATTRACT
APPLIC.
| OTHER
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
| |
TOTAL | 30%
| 18% | 9%
| 8% | 6%
| 5% | 24%
| 83 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
13% | 25%
| 6% | 6%
| 0% | 0%
| 50% | 16
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
32% | 17%
| 10% | 8%
| 6% | 5%
| 22% | 67
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 33%
| 15% | 12%
| 13% | 0%
| 7% | 20%
| 25 |
50 - 99 | 31%
| 14% | 8%
| 5% | 16%
| 4% | 22%
| 21 |
100 + | 26%
| 25% | 7%
| 5% | 4%
| 3% | 30%
| 37 |
Q11 How satisfactory did you find the performance of the FEC in
regard to these matters ?
. | VERY
SATIS.
| QUITE
SATIS.
| NOT PARTIC.
SATIS.
| NOT SATIS.
AT ALL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 37%
| 45% | 13%
| 5% | 83
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
31% | 50%
| 6% | 13%
| 16 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
38% | 44%
| 14% | 4%
| 67 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 |
29% | 58%
| 10% | 3%
| 25 |
50-99 | 40%
| 34% | 22%
| 4% | 21
|
100 + | 43%
| 39% | 11%
| 7% | 37
|
Q12. Did you apply for assistance under the Fair Employment Support
Scheme?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
SECTOR
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
56% | 44%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 50%
| 50% | 142
|
50 - 99 | 49%
| 51% | 101
|
100 + | 64%
| 36% | 96
|
Q13. Did you find the Fair Employment Support Scheme . . . .
. . . . . .
. | VERY
USEFUL
| QUITE
USEFUL
| NOT PARTIC
USEFUL
| NOT USEFUL
AT ALL
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
TOTAL | 56%
| 40% | 4%
| 0% | 194
|
|
SECTOR
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
56% | 40%
| 4% | 0%
| 194 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 52%
| 44% | 4%
| 0% | 72
|
50-99 | 60%
| 36% | 4%
| 0% | 51
|
100+ | 56%
| 39% | 5%
| 0% | 71
|
Q14. In which of the following respects did you find the scheme
useful ?
. | PERSONNEL
PROCEDURES
| MONITORING
| INFO.
SYSTEMS
| TRAINING
IN TESTS
| OTHER
| SAMPLE BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
TOTAL | 57%
| 62% | 21%
| 17% | 3%
| 185 |
| | |
| | | |
SECTOR
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
57% | 62%
| 21% | 17%
| 3% | 185
|
| | |
| | | |
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 55%
| 64% | 33%
| 14% | 0%
| 71 |
50-99 | 64%
| 52% | 11%
| 8% | 2%
| 48 |
100 + | 55%
| 66% | 11%
| 30% | 7%
| 66 |
Q15. Was the 1990 monitoring exercise an integral part of an overall
equal opportunities policy in your company ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE BASE NO. |
| | |
|
TOTAL | 73%
| 27% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
87% | 13%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
72% | 28%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 72%
| 28% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 76%
| 24% | 105
|
100 + | 71%
| 29% | 118
|
Q16. In addition to sex and religion do you monitor other aspects
of equal opportunity such as marital status or disability ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 30%
| 70% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
72% | 28%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
28% | 72%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 28%
| 72% | 148
|
50-99 | 24%
| 76% | 105
|
100 + | 42%
| 58% | 118
|
Q17. In order to undertake the 1990 monitoring exercise and,
more generally, comply with the new Fair Employment Legislation,
did you appoint any additional staff ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 8%
| 92% | 371
|
| | |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
19% | 81%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
8% | 92%
| 339 |
| | |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 4%
| 96% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 5%
| 95% | 105
|
100 + | 19%
| 81% | 118
|
Q18. How many additional staff and of what type did you employ?
Fewer than 10 respondents answered this question. It would not
be meaningful to present the results.
Q19 What is the annual cost of employing these additional staff
members?
Only 6 respondents answered this question quoting costs ranging
from below £7,000 to over £40,000. It would not be meaningful
to present the results.
Q20 Did complying with the monitoring exercise involve any other
additional costs to the company 7
| YES
| NO
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 40%
| 60% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
52% | 48%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
39% | 61%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 36%
| 64% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 35%
| 65% | 105
|
100 + | 52%
| 48% | 118
|
Q21 (PART A) Purpose of these additional costs
. | STAFF/
MANAGEMENT TIME
| EXTRA
STATIONERY
| OFFICE
EQUIP.
| PRINT.
| SET UP
COSTS
| COMPU
| OTHERS
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | |
| | | |
| |
TOTAL | 41%
| 27% | 19%
| 18% | 15%
| 13% | 22%
| 152 |
| | |
| | | |
| |
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
41% | 14%
| 11% | 11%
| 22% | 38%
| 27% | 18
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
41% | 28%
| 20% | 18%
| 15% | 12%
| 21% | 134
|
| | |
| | | |
| |
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 38%
| 25% | 23%
| 14% | 20%
| 6% | 18%
| 53 |
50 - 99 | 47%
| 31% | 13%
| 22% | 7%
| 6% | 23%
| 37 |
100 + | 42%
| 27% | 20%
| 19% | 15%
| 28% | 26%
| 62 |
Q21. (PART B) Number of reported items of additional cost
. | <£1,000
| £1,001-
5,000
| £5,001-
10,000
| £10,000
+
| SAMPLE BASE NO. (employers stating
additional costs)
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 143
| 33 | 3
| 7 | 152
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC | 11
| 8 | 2
| 5 | 18
|
PRIVATE | 132
| 55 | 1
| 2 | 134
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 62
| 4 | 0
| 1 | 53
|
50-99 | 37
| 5 | 0
| 0 | 37
|
100+ | 44
| 24 | 3
| 6 | 62
|
Q22. How many staff members were actually involved in conducting
the monitoring exercise ?
. | 1
| 2-3 | 4-5
| 6-8 | 9 +
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| | | |
TOTAL | 40%
| 53% | 5%
| 1% | 1%
| 371 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
39% | 47%
| 8% | 3%
| 3% | 32
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
40% | 53%
| 5% | 1%
| 1% | 339
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 44%
| 53% | 1%
| 1% | 1%
| 148 |
50-99 | 41%
| 53% | 6%
| 0% | 0%
| 105 |
100 + | 33%
| 52% | 10%
| 3% | 1%
| 118 |
Q23 Did you adopt any structural organisation changes in order
to carry out the monitoring exercise or as a result of it ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 13%
| 87% | 371
|
| | |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
27% | 73%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
13% | 87%
| 339 |
| | |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 13%
| 87% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 11%
| 89% | 105
|
100 + | 17%
| 89% | 118
|
Q24 Was a computer used to store/analyse information from your
monitoring exercise ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 17%
| 83% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
62% | 38%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
15% | 85%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 7%
| 93% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 14%
| 86% | 105
|
100 + | 39%
| 61% | 118
|
Q25 In terms of importance, what type of priority would you say
was given to the monitoring exercise ?
. | HIGH
| MEDIUM
| LOW
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
| | |
| |
TOTAL | 45%
| 40% | 15%
| 371 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
74% | 26%
| 0% | 32
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
43% | 40%
| 17% | 339
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 34%
| 47% | 19%
| 148 |
50 - 99 | 46%
| 37% | 17%
| 105 |
100 + | 64%
| 30% | 6%
| 118 |
Q26 Did you take any steps to encourage your employees to co-operate
in the monitoring exercise ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 51%
| 49% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
80% | 20%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
49% | 51%
| 339 |
| | |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 39%
| 61% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 53%
| 47% | 105
|
100 + | 68%
| 32% | 118
|
Q27 What type of steps did you take ?
. | LETTER
| STAFF MEET.
| LITER ATURE.
| MONITOR FORM
| SEN. STAFF
MEET.
| OTHER
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
|
TOTAL | 27%
| 20% | 10%
| 9% | 8%
| 26% | 197
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
18% | 11%
| 6% | 9%
| 9% | 47%
| 26 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
28% | 21%
| 10% | 8%
| 7% | 26%
| 171 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 17%
| 22% | 12%
| 13% | 7%
| 29% | 58
|
50-99 | 38%
| 26% | 6%
| 4% | 9%
| 17% | 56
|
100 + | 29%
| 14% | 12%
| 7% | 7%
| 31% | 83
|
Q28 Did you consult with trade union representatives before undertaking
the monitoring exercise?
. | YES
| NO
| NO UNION
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| |
TOTAL | 26%
| 28% | 46%
| 371 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
72% | 28%
| 0% | 32
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
24% | 28%
| 48% | 339
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 15%
| 31% | 54%
| 148 |
50 - 99 | 16%
| 31% | 53%
| 105 |
100 + | 57%
| 18% | 25%
| 118 |
Q29 How would you describe Trade Union Reaction in your workplace
to the introduction of the 1989 Fair Employment Legislation?
. | SUPP-
ORTIVE
| FAIR/
SATIS.
| MIXED
| UNENTHU
SIASTIC
| RESISTANT
NEGATIVE
| NO
REACTION
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
|
TOTAL | 49%
| 5% | 1%
| 8% | 3%
| 34% | 213
|
|
SECTOR
|
| | |
| | | |
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
71% | 0%
| 6% | 3%
| 0% | 20%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
47% | 5%
| 0% | 9%
| 3% | 36%
| 181 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 39%
| 3% | 0%
| 9% | 0%
| 49% | 67
|
50-99 | 48%
| 2% | 0%
| 7% | 6%
| 37% | 51
|
100+ | 61%
| 9% | 2%
| 8% | 5%
| 17% | 95
|
Q30 Were there occupational groups/grades whose response to the
monitoring exercise questionnaires seemed particularly low ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 8%
| 92% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
20% | 80%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
7% | 93%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 6%
| 94% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 8%
| 92% | 105
|
100 + | 11%
| 89% | 118
|
Q31 Which groups were these?(low response.)
. | MANUAL
WORKERS
| ALL
GROUPS
| SENIOR
STAFF
| UNION
MEMBERS
| TEMP.
WORKERS
| GROUP
5
| GROUP
8
| NO
SPEC.
| SAMPLE
BASE
|
NO |
TOTAL | 47%
| 19% | 13%
| 7% | 6%
| 3% | 2%
| 3% | 34
|
|
SECT0R
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
86% | 0%
| 0% | 14%
| 0% | 0%
| 0% | 0%
| 7 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
41% | 21%
| 15% | 6%
| 7% | 3%
| 2% | 4%
| 27 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 69%
| 31% | 0%
| 0% | 0%
| 0% | 0%
| 0% | 1
|
50 - 99 | 24%
| 9% | 24%
| 0% | 22%
| 10% | 0%
| 12% | 10
|
100 + | 43%
| 14% | 16%
| 20% | 0%
| 0% | 7%
| 0% | 15
|
Q32 Were there any occupational groups / grades whose response
to the monitoring exercise questionnaires seemed particularly
high?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 7%
| 93% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
16% | 84%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
6% | 94%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 4%
| 96% | 148
|
50-99 | 8%
| 92% | 105
|
100+ | 10%
| 90% | 118
|
Q33 Which groups were these ? (high response.)
. | ALL EMPLOY
| SOCIAL SERVICE
| SALARIED
WORKERS
| ADMIN
STAFF
| GROUPS
1,4,7,8,9.
| MANUAL
WORKER
| OTHER
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
| | | |
| |
TOTAL | 65%
| 5% | 8%
| 2% | 8%
| 3% | 9%
| 27 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC | 64%
| 18% | 0%
| 18% | 0%
| 0% | 0%
| 5 |
PRIVATE | 66%
| 4% | 8%
| 0% | 9%
| 4% | 10%
| 22 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 80%
| 0% | 0%
| 0% | 0%
| 0% | 21%
| 6 |
50-99 | 52%
| 0% | 23%
| 0% | 25%
| 0% | 0%
| 7 |
100+ | 66%
| 13% | 0%
| 6% | 0%
| 7% | 7%
| 14 |
Q34 Which principal method of monitoring did you use ?
.BASE | FIRST
SCHOOLS
| SECOND
SCHOOLS
| DIRECT
QUESTION
| SAMPLE
NO.
|
| | |
| |
TOTAL | 16%
| 8% | 76%
| 371 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
40% | 16%
| 44% | 32
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
14% | 8%
| 78% | 339
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 13%
| 9% | 78%
| 148 |
50- 99 | 15%
| 7% | 78%
| 105 |
100 + | 21%
| 9% | 70%
| 118 |
Q35-40 Difficulties in completing monitoring form
BASE | NOT
DIFF.
| SLIGHTLY
DIFF.
| QUITE
DIFF.
| VERY
DIFF.
| SAMPLE
NO.
|
| | |
| | |
CODING SCHOOLS |
52% | 38%
| 9% | 1%
| 107 |
USING RESIDUARY METHOD
| 36% | 45%
| 12% | 6%
| 182 |
COUNTING APPLICANTS
| 32% | 30%
| 20% | 17%
| 89 |
COUNTING APPOINTEES
| 76% | 17%
| 6% | 1%
| 108 |
CODING INTO 9 GROUPS
| 40% | 36%
| 20% | 4%
| 280 |
Q41 Did the requirement of having to disclose to employees, in
writing, the determination of their community background present
difficulties?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 8%
| 92% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
11% | 89%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
8% | 92%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 4%
| 96% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 13%
| 87% | 105
|
100 + | 10%
| 90% | 118
|
Q42 Did you find the monitoring exercise
. | VERY
USEFUL
| QUITE
USEFUL
| NO STRONG
VIEWS
| NOT PARTIC.
USEFUL
| NOT AT ALL
USEFUL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
TOTAL | 7%
| 20% | 38%
| 15% | 19%
| 371 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
27% | 29%
| 30% | 8%
| 6% | 32
|
PRIVATE SECTOR |
6% | 19%
| 39% | 16%
| 20% | 339
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 3%
| 21% | 41%
| 18% | 17%
| 148 |
50 - 99 | 5%
| 11% | 42%
| 11% | 30%
| 105 |
100 + | 17%
| 27% | 29%
| 15% | 12%
| 118 |
Q43 Would you say that complying with the Fair Employment Legislation
has generally improved your personnel practices and procedures?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 40%
| 60% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
57% | 43%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
39% | 61%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 39%
| 61% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 37%
| 63% | 105
|
100 + | 43%
| 57% | 118
|
Q44 Would you say that complying with the Fair Employment Legislation
has brought about changes in the way you go about recruiting staff
?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 41%
| 59% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
37% | 63%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
41% | 59%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 37%
| 63% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 40%
| 60% | 105
|
100 + | 51%
| 49% | 118
|
Q45 (PART A) Changes in staff recruitment practice
. | ADVER
TISING
| INTER
VIEW.
| UPDATED
FILING
| RECRUIT
METHOD
| NEW DOCU
MENTATION
| NO WORD
OF MOUTH
| APPROVED
AGENCIES
| OTHER
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL
| 57% | 18%
| 13% | 12%
| 11% | 10%
| 10% | 2%
| 151 |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC | 30%
| 35% | 8%
| 23% | 20%
| 0% | 0%
| 8% | 12
|
PRIVATE | 59%
| 17% | 13%
| 12% | 11%
| 11% | 11%
| 2% | 139
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 57%
| 20% | 12%
| 9% | 9%
| 12% | 5%
| 2% | 53
|
50 - 99 | 61%
| 9% | 13%
| 9% | 10%
| 15% | 14%
| 0% | 39
|
100 + | 55%
| 23% | 15%
| 19% | 15%
| 3% | 13%
| 3% | 59
|
Q45 (PART B) Number of reported items of additional cost. Cost
per annum
. | <£1,000
| £1,001-
5,000
| £5,001-
10,000
| £10,000 | + SAMPLE BASE NO.
(Employers stating
costs of new practices)
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 68
| 20 | 4
| 3 | 101
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC | 5
| 0 | 0
| 2 | 10
|
PRIVATE | 63
| 20 | 4
| 1 | 91
|
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 28
| 4 | 0
| 1 | 31
|
50-99 | 20
| 2 | 0
| 0 | 24
|
100+ | 20
| 14 | 4
| 2 | 46
|
Q46 As a result of the new Fair Employment Legislation have you
introduced Affirmative Action Measures?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 30%
| 70% | 371
|
| | |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
20% | 80%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
31% | 69%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 30%
| 70% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 30%
| 70% | 105
|
100 + | 30%
| 70% | 118
|
Q47 Have you introduced Affirmative Action Goals and Timetables?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 48%
| 52% | 107
|
| | |
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
43% | 57%
| 7 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
48% | 52%
| 100 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 40%
| 60% | 44
|
50 - 99 | 69%
| 31% | 30
|
100+ | 41%
| 59% | 33
|
Q48 Have you already begun a review of Employment Composition
and Practices which you are required to conduct at least once
every three years ?
. | YES
| NO
| SAMPLE
BASE NO.
|
| | |
|
TOTAL | 48%
| 52% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
51% | 49%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
48% | 52%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 52%
| 48% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 43%
| 57% | 105
|
100 + | 46%
| 54% | 118
|
Q49-53 SUMMARY TABLE
Help required regarding Review of Employment Composition and Practices
. | NONE
| A LITTLE
| QUITE
A LOT
| A GREAT
DEAL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
CONTENT & STRUCTURE
| 27% | 56%
| 14% | 4%
| 371 |
CATCHMENT AREAS |
37% | 46%
| 11% | 6%
| 371 |
FAIR PARTICIPATION
| 34% | 50%
| 11% | 5%
| 371 |
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
| 36% | 50%
| 10% | 5%
| 371 |
GOALS & TIMETABLES
| 39% | 47%
| 10% | 5%
| 371 |
Q49 Help required on content and structure of the review
. | NONE
| A LITTLE
| QUITE
A LOT
| A GREAT
DEAL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 27%
| 56% | 14%
| 4% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
15% | 71%
| 11% | 3%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
27% | 55%
| 14% | 4%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 29%
| 52% | 14%
| 5% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 31%
| 54% | 12%
| 3% | 105
|
100 + | 17%
| 66% | 14%
| 3% | 118
|
Q50 Help required working out catchment areas
. | NONE
| A LITTLE
| QUITE
A LOT
| A GREAT
DEAL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 37%
| 46% | 11%
| 6% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
20% | 44%
| 21% | 14%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
38% | 46%
| 10% | 6%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 40%
| 45% | 11%
| 4% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 38%
| 45% | 10%
| 7% | 105
|
100 + | 29%
| 49% | 13%
| 8% | 118
|
Q51 Help required with the determination of Fair Participation
. | NONE
| A LITTLE
| QUITE
A LOT
| A GREAT
DEAL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 34%
| 50% | 11%
| 5% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
13% | 60%
| 18% | 8%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
35% | 49%
| 11% | 5%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 34%
| 49% | 11%
| 6% | 148
|
50-99 | 44%
| 42% | 8%
| 6% | 105
|
100 + | 22%
| 61% | 15%
| 3% | 118
|
Q52 Help required with Affirmative Action Measures
. | NONE
| A LITTLE
| QUITE
A LOT
| A GREAT
DEAL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 36%
| 50% | 10%
| 5% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
20% | 58%
| 10% | 11%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
37% | 49%
| 10% | 4%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
<50 | 39%
| 48% | 8%
| 5% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 37%
| 47% | 10%
| 5% | 105
|
100 + | 29%
| 56% | 11%
| 4% | 118
|
Q53 Help required setting goals and timetables
. | NONE
| A LITTLE
| QUITE
A LOT
| A GREAT
DEAL
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 39%
| 47% | 10%
| 5% | 371
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
30% | 43%
| 13% | 14%
| 32 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
39% | 47%
| 10% | 4%
| 339 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 44%
| 42% | 10%
| 4% | 148
|
50 - 99 | 38%
| 48% | 10%
| 4% | 105
|
100 + | 31%
| 55% | 9%
| 5% | 118
|
Q54 Who would you look to in order to provide such help?
. | FEC
| PRIVATE
CONSULTANTS
| OWN
STAFF
| OTHER
| SAMPLE
BASE NO
|
| | |
| | |
TOTAL | 72%
| 20% | 15%
| 1% | 310
|
|
SECTOR
|
PUBLIC SECTOR |
85% | 6%
| 42% | 11%
| 31 |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
71% | 21%
| 13% | 1%
| 279 |
|
COMPANY SIZE
|
< 50 | 71%
| 20% | 15%
| 2% | 116
|
50-99 | 76%
| 17% | 12%
| 0% | 84
|
100 + | 69%
| 23% | 17%
| 2% | 110
|
© CCRU 1998-1999
site developed by: Martin Melaugh
page last modified:
Back to the top of this page
|
|